For the last few years I have been teaching, on a part-time
basis, a semester-long course on Ethics at Framingham State University in the
greater Boston area. I have created my own course outline and do not use a textbook.
For convenience sake, I put all the study material online for easy access to my
students.
I start by introducing them to various theories of ethics. We then
read numerous texts that deal with morality through the centuries, such as
ethics in the Hebrew Bible, in the New Testament, in the Koran, in medieval
literature and in contemporary writings. We follow this with a discussion of
various ethical issues covering a number of areas, like legal ethics,
environmental ethics, or medical ethics. We end the course with a major debate
on a few specific topics (e.g. a case of death penalty, an insanity defense,
tax fraud) that various groups of students get together to present to the class
for their evaluation and resolution.
My interest is to make students think, and develop the
ability to defend their point of view by using rational arguments, because the
subject of ethics basically deals with values that are, at times, in conflict
with each other. Two people struggling with an ethical dilemma can, and often
do, take opposite points of view, and hopefully justify them, not by invoking
religious dogma or authoritarian dicta, but by using a variety of cogent arguments.
Following the teachings of Aristotle and Maimonides, I encourage my students to
take the “Middle Road,” thus avoiding extreme positions.
We don’t know whether we are born with a sense of morality
or if ethics are learned from parents and teachers. When I observe the recently
born babies, with their aggressiveness to get what they want (e.g., food,
shelter), I am more convinced that we learn from others how to behave correctly.
(Note: the biblical Hebrew word for ethics is MUSAR, coming from the root
YASAR, meaning “discipline” or “chastening”). I consider it my job, to open the
mind of my students, leading them to tackle controversial issues by fair and
peaceful means. In particular, we have fun dealing with ethical dilemmas,
because they force us to take positions on difficult cases. Mostly, we end up
with the “best” alternative, even if it is not the worthiest solution.
Here is an example of an ethical dilemma: Three of David’s
classmates have created an offensive website that attacks students and teachers
in a vicious way. The principal wants to know who did it? David is the only one
who knows. You are David: will you lie to the principle by saying you don’t know
who did it, or betray your friends?
Here is another: There is a long line in a food court. You ask the agreeable buyer in the front to
include your order in his/hers, in exchange for the payment of lunch. You are the buyer in the front. Would
you do it?
I would be curious to know what is your position on either
dilemma. Please write to me at rsonsino@framingham.edu.
Rifat Sonsino, Rabbi, Ph.D.