Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D
(Our prayer is starting to take shape, thanks to the input of Edmond H. Weiss, Hillel Cohn, and others. )
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D
(Our prayer is starting to take shape, thanks to the input of Edmond H. Weiss, Hillel Cohn, and others. )
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D
For centuries,
scholars have been debating the question of who was Jesus, the individual? In
reality, we know very little about his life. As I wrote in my Modern Judaism
(Cognella, 2013, p. 182), “There is no contemporary evidence of Jesus that
refers to him or to his activities. It is presumed that he was a Galilean (Jew),
born in Nazareth around 4 BCE, and killed by the Romans around 30 CE….From all
we know, he was a Pharisee, and most likely belonged to a group of visionaries
who predicted the end of the Roman Empire, causing the ire of the Roman
authorities in Palestine.”
The
problem is compounded by the fact that the Gospel accounts in the New
Testament, which tell the story of Jesus, were written many centuries after his
death and are in many places contradictory, such as the time of his crucifixion
(Mark 15:25, at 9 am vs. John 19:14, at noon), his healing of blind people
(Mark 10:46, one person vs. Matt 20: 30, two men), and many others. Most New
Testaments scholars agree that the Gospels reflect the piety of the Church regarding
Jesus more than they reflect the individual Jesus.
Throughout
the years, Jewish researchers have developed various images of Jesus. According
to the historian Heinrich Graetz (19th cent), he was an “Essene”
(namely a member of one of the Jewish sects that emerged in the first century
CE); Abraham Geiger (d. in 1874) , a German Rabbi and scholar, viewed him as a
Pharisee with “Galilean coloring.” The British thinker, Claude Montefiore (d.
in 1938) considered him a prophet; Joseph Klausner (d.1958), an historian, portrayed
him as a great teacher of morality and an artist of parables; the philosopher
Martin Buber (d. 1965) called him “my great brother.” Samuel Sandmel, an expert
in the New Testament, (d.1979) thought “he had gifts of leadership and was
something of a teacher.”
In reality, it was
Paul, the apostle, who brought Jesus to the attention of the gentiles in Asia
Minor. Consequently, Christianity grew and became a different religion from
Judaism , stressing the concepts of salvation, Jesus as the intermediary
between God and the people ,and not only as a prophet who predicted the fall of
Rome, but also as the long awaited Messiah, even the son of God. Many early
Christians also believed that Jesus, who died at the cross, will come back again
in the future.
Muslims, too, have
high respect for Jesus: they believe that, born of the virgin Mary (Sura,
19:20), he was a messenger of God (Sura 4: 171), but not divine. Mohammad also
maintained that he was not crucified, as another man was made to resemble him
but that Allah took him to Himself (Sura 4: 157).
For
me, Jesus stands as a Jewish teacher and a preacher of antiquity, who opened
the door to a new understanding of the human existence. He appears to be a
person of piety and kindness, but not a divine being. This makes for a
wonderful dialogue between Jews, Moslems and Christians.
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D.
MY CONCEPT OF GOD:
In my book, The Many Faces of God (2004), I
have summarized my view on God in these words:
“Like others, I, too, went
from stage to stage in my theological development. I consider myself more of a
researcher and teacher rather than a systematic theologian. I like to look for
legitimate options, and make them available to my students and readers as
viable and authentic responses to matters of life and death. As an individual
I, too, had to struggle with questions of existence, and looked for
explanations that made sense to me. I gave up my childhood notion of classical
theism, because my logical mind and inquisitive nature would not yield the
conclusions I was asked to accept. I find mysticism appealing but not totally
compatible with my rationalistic tendencies. I am not satisfied with the claim
of the religious humanists that God, as the highest image of ourselves, is
capable of answering our queries. Also, I cannot conceive of a theology that
looks at the universe from the divine perspective. I believe theology starts
with our own questions, and ends with our tentative answers.
I am more attracted to the
views of the religious naturalists who maintain that there is an energy that
sustains the universe. Based on observation and analysis, I see a certain order
in the world around us, and conclude, much like some of the medieval thinkers
and even a few early rabbis, that this order implies an ordering mind, or in my
case, an ordering power and energy that stands for God. The laws of nature, I
argue, are simply a manifestation of this universal energy that makes possible
for me to exist. And for this, I am very appreciative, and express my thanks to
God through prayers of gratitude and works of loving-kindness that benefit my
family and community. I affirm the freedom of the human will, and can live with
the realization that I don’t have all the answers for the tension that exists
between the realities of good and evil, because I do not know all the inner
workings of the universe. In the spirit of Spinoza, I say that if we knew how
the world operates, we could predict our next move. But alas, this is not
within our ability. So, we live in an imperfect world and with limited
abilities to understand the mysteries around us, while desperately looking for
meaning and purpose in our daily struggles” (pp.250-1).
WHAT PRAYER
ACCOMPLISHES
Of the three major types of prayer (i.e., praise,
gratitude and petition), it is the prayers of petition that create problems for
many people. The reasons vary: we expect an immediate answer that fails to
materialize; the text of the prayer is inadequate either because of its archaic
nature, patriarchal language or non-inclusive character; sometimes we even
equate nobility of expression with profundity of thought. In reality the crux
of the problem is theological. Heschel once said, “The issue of prayer is not
prayer; the issue of prayer is God” (Man’s Quest for God. New York:
Charles Scribner’s, 1954, 58). Consequently, if you believe, you can then pray.
For a long time I, too, subscribed to this notion. However, recently, I
realized that people could struggle with prayer and theology at the same time.
As theological views become clearer, prayers too become more authentic. Prayer
is a natural need of every human being. The question is what to expect from it?
Here below are my conclusions:
1. To
help create a good prayerful mood, one needs an inspiring text and an uplifting
music within an appropriate physical setting.
2. Prayers
should be read not as legal briefs but as poetry pointing to something higher.
3. One
should refrain to pray for the impossible, for God works through the laws of
nature, and God is not likely to change the course of events no matter how
fervent the prayer or pious the individual.
4. It
is more important to express one’s goals and aspirations through prayers than
to expect an answer for them. If we are able to formulate our thoughts clearly
and turn them into a program of action, the action itself becomes our answer.
5. Prayers
do not change the world outside, but give the worshipers a better insight into
themselves. As the Gates of Prayer had it, “Who rise from prayer better
persons, their prayer is answered.”
6. Even
if, at the moment, it is not possible to enter into a prayerful mood, one can
and should identify with the community as part of the worship experience. By
praying together we can strengthen one another.
MY RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHY-PART TWO
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D.
THE SENSE OF WONDER
When I wake up in the morning and realize that I am
alive in a world that operates in a reliable yet mysterious ways, I am moved to
express gratitude to God that has made me part of it. Abraham J. Heschel once
wrote, “Wonder or radical amazement is the chief characteristic of the
religious man’s attitude toward history and nature.” (See, God in Search of
Man; Philadelphia: JPS, 1962, 45). The awareness that the universe has an
intricate composition has led many, including me, to revere life. Not only am I
in awe before the workings of the world, even during a pandemic such as the
Corona Virus of the 2020’s, but I am equally struck by the way our bodies
operate harmoniously most of the time. I view human beings as bulks of energies
stimulated by forces within and without. How does the heart know to beat
regularly? How does our digestive system work so properly most of the time? The
ancient rabbis, noting this wonder, even penned a prayer to be said after one
wakes up: “Blessed are You, God, who has formed the human body in wisdom, and
has created in it intricate passages, vessels and openings. It is clear to You
that if one of them is blocked or opened, we could not stand before You.
Blessed are You, God, who heals all flesh in a wondrous way.”
RELIGION
The universe operates in wondrous ways. However, this
recognition does not eliminate the problems we face in our daily life, either
because of the limitations of our
bodies, the unfairness we encounter in our dealings with others, or even
when we fight natural disasters not of our own making. We are devastated when
tragedies mar our existence. Most of us can understand and accept that people
will eventually pass away, but we find it very difficult to deal with the death
of a loved one, either at the hands of others or because of natural causes. We
do not live in a perfect world, and certainly do not know all the intricacies
of the universe. Life is mysterious,
and, at times, even unpredictable, requiring a wholesome perspective. For many,
including me, religion does that.
But what does the word
“religion” mean? Some people derive it from the Latin “relegare” meaning to
re-examine carefully, and others from “religare” meaning to connect (with God).
Even though the second one is the most popular understanding of the word today,
it is still vague. What does it mean to connect with God? What does God mean?
Hebrew does not have a proper word for “religion.” In medieval times, we find
the word dat, which can mean law, custom or faith. In modern Hebrew a dati
is a religiously observant person.
Of the various definitions
of religion, I believe, Erich Fromm (1900-1980) has provided the broadest one.
He argued that religion gives the individual a “frame of orientation” as well
as “an object of devotion.” Each of us has a “frame of orientation” through
which we view the world, and “an object of devotion” to which we pledge
ultimate loyalty. The question is how to identify these “frames” and “objects?”
Maimonides (d. 1204) defined
religion as “to know God (intellectually).” For Mordecai Kaplan (1881-1983)
“the essence of every religion is the human quest for salvation (i.e..,
self-realization).” In Abraham J. Heschel’s (1907-1972) view, “Religion is an
answer to man’s ultimate questions.” Roland Gittelsohn (1910-1995) proposed one
in line with his religious naturalism: it is “the study of the mutual spiritual
relations between human organisms and their total cosmic environment.” Alvin Reines (1926-2004) suggested: “Religion
is the human person’s response to the conflict of finitude;” namely, how do we
deal with the realization that we are all limited and are destined to die one
day? For me, religion needs to be
defined broadly as a way to help us find our place in the world, with all its
limitations and possibilities. In this sense, I consider everyone religious
because we all have the same concerns and expectations. Whether we are Jewish,
Christian, Muslim (or other), how we personally respond to our existential
questions becomes our religion. For me, Judaism, provides the best
interpretation of human life, with its plusses and minuses, and that is why, in addition to being part of
the Jewish people, I choose to remain a religious Jew.
The term “religion” is much
wider than “observance.” The second one
deals with practices, the first refers to one’s attitude to life in general.
Also, even though most religious people are moral individuals, “religion” and
“morality” are not one and the same, because plenty of people have claimed to be
religious while engaging in unethical behavior.
Dec. 7, 2020