To my family, friends and readers…
For 2022, I wish you
A happy and healthy New Year
Bonne Annee
Feliz año nuevo
Buon anno
Yeni yiliniz kutlu olsun
שנה טובה ומתוקה
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.d
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D
A curse is usually
defined as an expression of a wish that misfortune befall another person or
group. Therefore, strictly speaking, using a cuss word is not really a curse.
Here is a biblical
example of a curse: God said to Adam: “By the sweat of your brow, shall you eat
bread to eat” (Gen. 3:19).
Here is a Talmudic
example: “May it be Heaven’s will that a horn sprouts from between your eyes”
(Shab. 108a).
Here is a modern
example from a Yiddish curse: “ I hope you sink like a ship.”
In the past, people
took curses seriously. In fact, one Rabbi taught: “Let not the curse of a
common man seem trivial in your eyes” (B. Meg, 15a). Many actually believed
that curses had a power of action and derived their strength from the gods
(e.g. I Sam. 17:43). That is, people thought that when someone uttered a curse,
it will actually take place. Sheldon Blank, a biblical scholar, called them “automatic
and self-fulfilling” (HUCA 33, 1950-51, 73-95). Therefore, many were afraid of being
cursed.
In order to
insurance compliance, curses in the past were often attached to law codes or
covenants. Here is an example of a curse from the Laws of Hammurabi (17th
cent. BCE): “May Enlil (the god) , the determiner of destinies…incite revolts
against him [the person who disregards the laws] in his abode, which he cannot
suppress, misfortune leading to his ruin” (ANET, p. 179, line 51). Here is another
one found at the end of a treaty between Suppiluliumas, the Hittite king (14th
cent. BCE), and Kurtizawa; “If you,
Kurtiwaza, the prince……do not fulfil the words of this treaty, may the gods,
the lords of the oath, blot you out” (ANET, 206). Similarly, many biblical law
codes ended with blessings and curses to insure compliance. Here is an example
from the curses attached to the end of the laws in Leviticus: “ If you do not
obey Me (God)…I will loose wild beasts against you..(Lev. 26: 18-22).
Today, however, many
of us do not believe that curses include the power of action. Therefore they
are not likely to take effect. They simply express our displeasure towards
another. They do not have any reality attached to them. They are just silly
statements, like, “May you always step in a wet spot after putting on fresh
socks,” or, “some day you’ll go far-and I really hope you stay there.” So,
don’t waste sleep over if someone utters a curse against you. It is not going
to happen, though you may have to find a new friend.
Dec. 15, 2021; Total pageviews: 680,124.
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D
I do not, and
don’t need one. But many people do. In fact, in my research I found out that
Lucky D. Rich (d.1971), a New Zealand performance artist, is best known for
holding the Guinness World Record as “the most tattooed person.” He had tattoos
in every part of his body!
The origin of
the word “tattoo” is controversial. Some people derive it from the Samoan
“tatau,” meaning “to strike,” others derive it from the Tahitian, “tatu,”
meaning “to mark.” Was tattooing known in the past? Yes. Ancient Egyptians used
to brand their slaves with the names of the owners to whom they belonged. It
was a sign of submission.
It is also
not clear how tattooing became popular in the West. According to the dominant
view, it was the British explorer, James Cook, who brought it back to Europe after
his voyages to the Far East in the late 18th century.
The Hebrew
Bible prohibits tattooing when it states that a person should not “incise any
marks” on oneself (Lev. 19:28). The Hebrew word for tattoo is ketovet kaaka. We know ketovet refers to
writing, but we don’t know exactly what kaaka
means. Nor do we know the root of the verb. Onkelos, the author of the Aramaic
translation of the Hebrew Bible, 3rd cent. CE, renders it as rushmin
haretin, meaning, “engraving a mark.”
It is not
even clear why is there a prohibition against it, even though most scholars
claim that somehow it has to do with idolatrous practices involving the cult of
the dead (Martin Noth, Lev. p 143). The medieval Jewish commentator Ibn Ezra seems to agree with it (see his comments on Lev.
19:28). The Quran does not specifically mention tattooing, but there is a
strong Muslim tradition that considers tattooing “haram” (prohibited) based on
the belief that one should not change the creation of Allah (See Quran, Women,
118-121). Christianity does not have a clear teaching on this subject.
Jewish law is
ambivalent on the subject of tattooing. In general, it prohibits it, especially if it
leaves a lasting mark (Mak. 3:6). However, Rabbi Simeon b. Judah, applied this
law only in cases of idolatry (Mak. 21 a). The medieval Jewish philosopher ,
Maimonides, considered it an idolatrous practice (Mishne Torah, Laws of
Idolatry, 12:11). There is also a popular belief that tattooed Jews are not
allowed to be buried in Jewish cemeteries, but this is not correct (See, Freehof’s
Responsa, viii, 119). Yet, there are
indications that in the past even some Jews accepted tattooing for the right
reasons. According to the Hebrew Bible, it was acceptable if one were to mark
his arm with a sign referring to God, thus becoming subservient to the divine:
“Another shall mark his arm “of the Lord” “(Isa. 44:5, JPS).
Why do people
get tattoos today? You will get various answers: self-expression, artistic
freedom, rebellion, to cover imperfections etc.
One thing is
clear: tattooing is here to stay, and I presume it will continue to be popular
among many people.
So, do you
want to get a tattoo? Get one, and make sure it is medically safe, but you
don’t need to compete with Lucky!
Dec. 5, 2021. Total pageviews world-wide: 677,239
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D
In Jewish tradition, it is customary to name children after
parents. Sephardic Jews name a child
after a living parent, who, while alive, can rejoice in the perpetuation of
one’s name. Ashkenazic Jews, however, name their children after parents who are
deceased, because giving some else your name while alive implies that the donor
is about to lose his/her own life. It was the Romans who originated a
system of naming, consisting of a combination of personal and family names. Today,
many parents are giving their children names freely chosen by the father and
mother, unrelated to family.
However, whether one names a child after a living or a dead
relative, or, a parent chooses names taken from the realm of nature, the ethical
question for me is whether or not it is appropriate to burden someone with a
name chosen by others.
To give you an example: I was born in Turkey and was named
Rifat after my grandfather whose Hebrew name was Refael. The Hebrew word means,
“Heal, [O] God”, and is found in I Chr. 26: 7, as the name of a Levitical
priest. Refael-Rifat: that was close enough. The name Rifat is in Turkish (from
the Arabic verb RAFAA, meaning to elevate; RIFAT in Arabic means,
“excellency.”). I had no issues with it while I lived in Istanbul or Ankara,
but when I moved to Paris and then came to the States in the early 60’s, my
name became a problem, because few people could recognize it and even fewer
could pronounce it.
A quick study shows that many societies around the globe have
different traditions regarding naming. In Costa Rica, for example, it was common to
name children after saints; in some parts of India, it is the horoscope that
determines the name; in Spain, one gets one or two names, followed by two
surnames to honor mother and father or grandparents; in Greece, one waits a few
days and then is given the name of a grandfather or grandmother.
However, all these customs still impose a name upon children
who have to live with it. What happens if, later on, they don’t like their
name? Why should they carry this burden for the rest of their lives?
In the Hebrew Bible, a number of people had a name change: For
instance, Abram became Abraham, Sarai became Sarah, Joseph became Zafnat
Paneah, Yedidyah became Solomon. In the New Testament, Saul became Paul. In modern times, a number of celebrities have changed their name.
Thus, for example, Reginald Kenneth Dwight became Elton John; Jennifer L.
Anastassakis became Jennifer Aniston; Destiny Hope Cyrus became Miles Syrus and
Eric Marlon Bishop became Jamie Foxx.
Maybe, one should get a temporary name for the first few
years of one’s life, and then, upon reaching adulthood, adopt a personal name
chosen freely by the individual. In my case, I should have changed my name when
I came to the States in 1961, but I never did.
What do you think?
Nov. 9, 2021; 669,980 blog viewers, worldwide.
Rabbi Rifat Sonsino, Ph.D
There is a statement in the Book of Ecclesiastes, 1:9 that
reads: “There is nothing new under the sun.” We find similar statements in
Akkadian proverbs, such as “The life of the day before yesterday is that of any
day” (ANET, p. 425). R.B.Y. Scott tells us that one finds parallel statements
in Elamite and Greek texts (The Anchor Bible, Proverbs and Ecclesiastes,
p.211).
The meaning of the Hebrew proverb is not clear: does it
imply that things always remain the same and that there are no changes in
anything? This goes against our human experiences. Very often, we see that what
was acceptable yesterday is no longer de rigueur now. In fact, we see changes
everywhere. Nothing remains the same. The river keeps flowing. Styles change, habits
change, our language changes as they reflect what is going in our lives
today.
Some commentators in the past tried to explain the proverb according
to their own understanding of the times. The Talmud, for example, states that the
biblical assertion that “there is nothing new under the sun,” simply means that
there are no new creations after the six days of creation” (Sanh. 110a). For the
medievalist commentator, Rashi, “the phrase contrasts futile daily activity
done ‘in place of the Sun (: Light, Torah), i.e, in contrast to the spiritual activity of
Torah study and living”(The Jewish Study Bible, p. 1607).
My wife and I now live in the independent section of a
retirement community outside of Boston. My experience here seems to echo the
biblical assumption that changes are not always well received, especially by people
of old age. Many residents don’t want to
see any changes in the structure of our association. They long for the days
when dinner was formal, with proper attire by the servers. No phones during
dinner time. Any change is threatening to their psyche. Maybe because seniors
have seen too many changes in their lifetime, and now that they have reached the
zenith of their existence, they wish to preserve whatever they had accomplished
intact. Any alteration, for them, means that what they had done in the past is
no longer good or valid. And that hurts. But, I think, this is simply part of
the fear of death or the fear of the unknown. It is better, I believe, to confront
the changing realities around us and face them with courage, instead of ignoring
the novelties that affect our daily lives. Changes will happen, whether we like
it or not. We might as well deal with them.